Fire Articles
SHIPBOARD
FIRE FIGHTING
Fire aboard a ship
at sea is one of a seafarer's worst fears.
Fighting a serious fire tests the crew and
equipment to the limit. Ken Martin, the retired
Deputy Firemaster, Highland and Islands Fire
Brigade, Scotland, describes how a blaze aboard a
Russian factory ship was brought under control.
At approximately 1500
hours on Thursday July 29 a member of the ship's
crew aboard the 12,500 tonne Kalingrad-registered
CHERNMORSKYA SLAVA, a Russian factory ship,
noticed smoke issuing from the hatch covers of
hold 5C which was located directly below the
process deck and forward of the fish meal plant
and engine space.
The vessel was anchored
one mile north of Bressay and outside harbour
limits and was one of 70 or more vessels of the
Klondyker fleet anchored in and around Lerwick,
Shetland, at that time.
The Master of the vessel
ordered first aid fire fighting with hand-held
jets from the ship's main, but this proved
ineffective due possibly to the poor mains
pressure available and the fact that the team
were driven back by heat and smoke. He decided to
batten down and use the CO 2 flooding system
having assumed, erroneously as it turned out,
that the hold was sealed. The system operated
satisfactorily but failed to extinguish the fire.
At around 1800 hours a
Lerwick-based shipping agent on a routine visit
to the vessel noticed the fire and after
discussion with the Master advised him to inform
the Coastguard. The Master was reluctant to do so
at first but as the fire situation worsened he
conceded to the agent's request and a call for
assistance was received at Coastguard Rescue
Centre - Lerwick at 1845 hours, nearly four hours
after the fire was discovered.
The Coastguard alerted
Fire Brigade Control at Inverness that there was
a fire aboard the vessel at 1846 hours.
The brigade's offshore
response team was in the process of being set up
at the time with 17 firefighters in each team and
teams based in Shetland, Orkney and the Western
Isles. The teams had been set up initially at the
request of the islands' Council's of the three
Island groups, amid concerns for ferry travelers
following a number of high profile incidents in
the late 1980s and early 1990s. Discussions with
the Coastguard relating to a "memorandum of
understanding" were underway with UK Fire
Services with coastal responsibilities. Although
all teams had received training including
specialised ship fire fighting and offshore
survival the final commissioning order had not be
promulgated at this time.
DECISION TO
MOBILISE
In any incident offshore
the decision to mobilise lies with the Firemaster
and in this case he gave permission for the
Shetland Unit to be mobilised to stand by at a
predetermined embarkation point. By 1938 hours a
Sub Officer and five firefighters from Lerwick
had been assembled and were transported to the
vessel by harbour launch from Lerwick arriving at
1956 hours.
On arrival the Sub
Officer found smoke issuing from the hatches of
the hold immediately forward of the accommodation
and engine room. He proceeded to the bridge and
established contact with the Master and Ship's
Engineer who informed him that the fire had been
discovered at approximately 1500 hours on that
day in Number 5 hold on C deck, one deck below
the Process deck in a cargo of 100t of flat
packed cardboard cartons used in the fish packing
process.
Discussions with the
Master and Ship's Engineer and perusal of the
ship's plans enabled the sub officer to ascertain
that the B deck immediately below also contained
a similar cargo and that A deck was empty. The
Ship's Engineer informed him that these holds
were refrigerated holds but were not being
utilised in this mode at this time.
The plans revealed that
there was an access hatch on the starboard side
from the fish process deck and having been
assured that this was the only access and that
the hold was sealed, the Officer in Charge
decided that the most appropriate method of
attack would be to attempt to flood the hold with
high-expansion foam and he requested extra foam
stocks and men to be flown out.
Conditions appeared to
be deteriorating at this time and the Coastguard
prevailed upon the Master to consider evacuation
and this was commenced at about 2100 hours when
50% of the 162 crew members were transferred to a
sister vessel which had drawn alongside. The fire
fighting operation was commenced at 2200 hours
and continued for two hours. Although the attack
appeared to pacify the fire it did not prove
successful in extinguishing the fire for reasons
that will be explained later, and the demands for foam compounds soon
exceeded supply enforcing the adoption of a
"stop-go" strategy.
As the vessel was lying
about three miles off Lerwick, attempts were made
to persuade the Master to move to a berth
alongside. This was met with point blank refusal
due possibly to the fact that the owners would
become liable for harbour dues, in addition to
which her sister ship the Darius already lay
impounded at Dales Voe Pier for non-payment of
dues. At 0200 hours on Friday 30 July and after
the initial crew had been committed for several
hours, the Officer in Charge requested relief
crews be made available at 0300 hours.
At this time it was
becoming increasingly apparent that the logistics
of re-supply of foam and compressed air cylinders
for operators working in the smoke-logged
conditions on the process deck was becoming
critical and renewed efforts were made to
persuade the Master to move the vessel inshore
but met with no success.
Conditions on board by
this time had stabilised, and the Master,
perceiving the vessel to be in no immediate
danger, allowed some of the crew to return to the
vessel from other fishing vessels in the fleet,
where they had sought refuge during the night. By
this time tug assistance had arrived and deployed
cooling monitors to the hull as well as
augmenting the onboard fire water supply from
their fire fighting pumps.
The Firemaster decided
to supplement the Shetland team with a team from
Orkney and to send the Divisional Commander from
C Division, Divisional Officer Ken Martin to
assume overall command of the incident.
A request also went out
to Grampian Fire Brigade for assistance and they
responded with a team of eight firefighters.
After establishing
contact with the Coastguard the Divisional
Officer accompanied the relief crews to the
vessel and was briefed by the departing Sub
Officer. The vessel at this time was showing
signs of blistering on the starboard side of the
hull consistent with the level of the fire on C
deck. Bunker fuel in wing tanks had been diverted
and replaced with water.
CHANGE OF TACTICS
After some negotiation
with the Master, a change of tactics ensued
whereby a concentrated attack with eight jets via
the main hatch was attempted and although
partially successful, the accumulation of water a
four-degree list which was the maximum the Master
would allow. At this a further access hatch not
shown on the ship's plan was located on the port
side of the process deck and a team was committed
with a jet to attempt to establish a foothold on
C deck, taking a BA guide line should a retreat
in the smoke be necessary. Conditions were
extremely punishing and the duration of the
breathing apparatus (BA) sets was reduced to as
little as 15 min but the exercise confirmed that
there was a well-established fire in the centre
of the hold and on the starboard side and that
stacks of cardboard some three metres high were
becoming unstable and indeed had collapsed into a
heap in the centre, engulfing the narrow access
gangways. The BA. team retreated and no further
attempt was made to establish a presence on C
deck, at this time.
Difficulties at
this time centred on five main problems:
- On board equipment
not compatible.
- Logistics of supply.
- Transport of relief
crews.
- Difficulties with
removing fire fighting water.
- Difficulty of
communicating with ship's fire fighting
crews and to some extent with the Master
and deck officer.
The logistics of
supplying foam compound and compressed air
cylinders which required charging onshore was
proving difficult and resulted in an interrupted
fire fighting strategy.
The main mode of
transport over the first 24-hour period had been
by lifeboat. All reliefs had been used up and the
Royal National Lifeboat institution (RNLI) had to
discontinue its operation in order that it could
be made ready for a life-threatening emergency,
bearing in mind that the situation on-board the
casualty was no longer life threatening.
Consultation with the
Coastguard and Lerwick Harbour Trust resulted in
an auxiliary vessel, The Knap, being made
available. This vessel was considerably slower
and added forty minutes to the round trip for
supplies. The difficulties in removing firewater
were alleviated by utilising the ship's own fire
fighting crew to check boundaries and clear
clogged strum boxes. These firefighters were
very committed
individuals and worked extremely hard for the
duration of the incident. As none of these
firefighters spoke English, contact had to be
made via the Ship's Engineer who was the on-site
manager of the incident from the ship's crew. It
is worth noting that some of our initial
firefighters had spent 27 hours on board before
being relieved.
Fire fighting continued
throughout Friday and during that night using a
combination of foam, jets and thermal imaging
cameras to locate the seat of the fire, but by
Saturday the difficulties of re-supply meant that
the only effective way of tackling the fire was
for the vessel to be brought alongside. A meeting
at the Coastguard Rescue Centre between the
emergency services and the harbour authorities
and Shetland islands Council Emergency Planning
Team issued the Master an ultimatum informing him
that the fire fighting effort would have to be
abandoned unless he allowed his vessel to be
moved to Dales Voe deep water terminal. All
agencies concerned were unaware at this time that
the vessel had lost steerage, as a result of
cables passing from the bridge forward to the
engine room being destroyed by the fire. At this
time a request was made to Trafalgar House to put
pressure on the owner to allow the Master to
accommodate the request. The Master hinted that
he would clear for sea and make for his home port,
but because of the technical problems mentioned
above, finally requested tug assistance into port.
At 1500 hours on
Saturday the vessel assisted by the tugs
KIRKBISTER and STANECHUCKER berthed alongside the
DARIUS at Dales Voe. This concluded the co-ordination
role of the Coastguard and the centre of
operations moved to Lerwick Fire Station District
Office.
The advantages of a
shore-based continuous attack on the fire were
immediately obvious and by Saturday evening the
fire was suppressed enough to allow a tentative
foray into hold 5C. The euphoria was to be short-lived
however, as it became apparent that the access
hatch to B deck was open and that the fire had
spread via that route and open freezer
compartment ventilators into the deck below which,
as previously mentioned, also contained on
cardboard cartons.
By Sunday morning crews
had established a full presence (three teams) on
C deck and one two-man team had fought their way
down the ladder access onto B deck and were
preparing to enter for a reconnaissance when
timber flooring gave way and plunging one fire
fighter down onto A deck which contained about
one metre of water at this time. Luckily this
broke his fall and he was able to relocate the
access ladder and make his way back up to B deck
where his companion (who had activated his
distress signal unit) and other colleagues
assisted him to the main deck. In view of the
danger posed by the B deck flooring it was
decided to tackle that fire by extinguishing C
deck first and clearing the main hatches so that
fire fighting jets could be got to work that way.
By late Sunday the fire
on B deck had also been subdued and on Monday the
work began of clearing access on C deck.
Work was hampered due to
the lack of portside lifting facilities and small
teams had to be employed to work the cargo by
hand, turning over and damping down. BA wearing
was still necessary and this also extended the
clearing up operation. 'Work continued during the
week and the fire was declared out at 2124 hours
on Thursday, 5 August 1993.
The whole incident had
utilized the services of three fire brigades, the
Coastguard and its SAR wing. Police and the RNLI
as well as the valuable contribution by Lerwick
Harbour Trust and BP Sullum Voe and Shetlands
Islands Council Emergencv Planning Section. One
hundred and fifty fire fighters used 250 BA
cylinders in the weeklong operation and 500
gallons of foam compound were used, some shipped
from as far away as Wick and Aberdeen.
THE INVESTIGATION
A subsequent fire
investigation was carried out by the author
assisted by Sub Officer Anderson (the officer in
charge of the first attendance).
Inspection of the hold 5C
where the fire originated revealed that although
cargo had been turned over and dampened down, it
had not been discharged due to an absence of
shore side facilities and remained in both
affected holds, although access to main hatches
and access ladders had been cleared and areas
where parts of the floor timber had been burnt
away had been suitably cordoned.
The insulation of each
hold consisting of cork and polystyrene-backed
aluminium facings had been almost totally
consumed in the fire and the bulkhead between
number 5 and number 4 holds which housed the
refrigeration plan bore testimony that the fire
passed through from C deck to B deck as the
ventilators were stuck in the open position. This
also explained why initial CO2, and high
expansion foam attacks were only partially
successful. The inspection also revealed damage
to the steering cables on the starboard side and
the heat distortion of the steel load bearing
floor beams supporting the floor of the process
deck.
The severest damage was
evident in the forward starboard corner of the
hold 5C and extended along the starboard section
the length of the hold. Earlier observations had
concluded that housekeeping was poor on the
vessel and that there did not appear to be any
non-smoking areas. The casual way in which crews
discarded smoking materials had also been
commented on during fire fighting operations.
As it was not possible
to clear the cargo, a categorical cause of fire
was difficult to determine. The following were
plausible causes but listed in no particular
order of priority.
a) Careless disposal
of smoking materials - from observations made
during the fire and the fact that there were gaps
in the main hatch covers.
b) Wilful fire
raising - at the time the Master stated
"that he did not have reason to suspect this
cause" as he had not encountered recent
personnel problems aboard. Subsequent reports in
1994 however indicated that the vessel had again
caught fire in her home port with the loss of
three lives. This however was never substantiated.
c) Electrical -
the vessel was generally in a poor state of
repair and the areas affected contained
electrical equipment. There was a so evidence of
rodents aboard.
d) Direct ignition of
the cargo due to close proximity to a light
source. No direct evidence, but the height of
the stacks of cardboard was such that some
material may have come into contact with
artificial electrical lighting.
CONCLUSIONS
Problems associated with
the incident.
- Late call to the
incident - the Master and crew attempted
to fight the fire with insufficient
resources and with a flawed strategy as
they assumed wrongly that the hold was
effectively sealed when they decided on a
CO2 discharge.
- The delay in
waiting to see if the extinguishing media
had done its job allowed the fire to gain
a firm hold in the commodities stored.
- Master of the
vessel not wholly in charge of decision
making.
- Language and
interpretation difficulties.
- Ship's plans not
wholly accurate, difficult to interpret.
- No information on
stability available.
- Fire fighting
equipment on board not compatible.
- Fire pump on board
inadequate to provide good working jets
or large enough to remove water rapidly.
- No access onto
vessel when at anchor other than Jacob's
ladder over a 7m freeboard.
- Little initial
control over ship's fire fighting crews.
- Breathing apparatus
on board of a type unknown in Britain. No
control procedures for wearing, no
duration tables available.
- Very little co-operation
initially particularly requests to bring
the vessel alongside.
The Dales Voe terminal
has no dockside crane facilities and this led to
the incident becoming protracted as the cargo
could not be discharged, but only hoisted to deck
level turned over, extinguished fully and
returned to segregated areas in the affected
holds.
Fire safety legislation
and the Fire Services Act in the UK make
provision for periodic inspection of high risk
installations on shore but this does not extend
to vessels tied alongside or more particularly
those at anchor in harbour limits. Until such
time as routine inspections for familiarisation
and follow-up exercises can be conducted on
visiting vessels then successful fire fighting
will remain more difficult and serious than
firefighters normally encounter in the course of
their duties.
As a result of the above
incident a code of practice was drawn up by the
Marine
Safety Agency, which
required safety inspections of all vessels, in
and around Shetland and other ports, associated
with the Klondyker fleet.
The considerable cost to
the Harbour Authority and the Fire Services
involved was refunded in full after protracted
negotiations. Since the incident the Highland and
Islands Fire Brigade has introduced ultra
lightweight carbon/kevlar composite cylinders in
order to reduce wearer stress and increase
working duration.
SELECTION OF
ADAPTERS
Due to the variety of
fittings on the fire fighting systems of foreign
vessels a selection of adapters to a variety of
shipping using the North Sea have been purchased.
The contribution made by
thermal imaging cameras has been recognised and
all the teams are issued with such devices. Work
is also on-going in the Fire Service to develop
remote controlled thermal imaging and infra red
systems that would allow rapid assessment of fire
scenarios similiar to the above, where the
deployment of firefighters may be hazardous.
The use of a mixture of
communications systems at this incident prompted
the Brigade to train up some team members in
marine radio procedures via the Coastguard Agency.
Marine band licenses have since been issued to
operators in each team.
|